Which aspect of competence is violated if a member lacks the specific capabilities to complete role-specific tasks?

The correct answer is related to the concept of "skills," which refers to the practical application of knowledge and abilities in performing specific tasks effectively. In a professional context, possessing the necessary skills means that an individual can apply their knowledge and capabilities to complete role-specific tasks proficiently.

When a member lacks the specific skills required for their role, it indicates a violation of the competence framework that underscores the importance of having the relevant competencies necessary to execute job responsibilities. Skills are often developed through training, practice, and experience, and are essential for meeting the expectations and demands of a particular position.

Other aspects of competence, such as abilities and knowledge, while important, do not directly correlate to the execution of specific tasks as much as skills do. Abilities may refer more broadly to one's potential to learn or perform, knowledge relates to the information one possesses, and experience encompasses the practical exposure one has had over time. Therefore, while all these elements contribute to an individual's overall competence, the direct link to being capable of completing specific tasks lies in the skill set.